Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 07:58

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Do you know a good lawyer joke?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Italy citizenship referendum polarises country - BBC
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Et expedita consequatur quam et.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What should I do to get over a relationship?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Genetic and biological clues point to inflammation’s role in mental health - PsyPost
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
The Bold and the Beautiful preview week of June 23: a marriage proposal and a trap? - Yahoo